Unfortunately I had to teach yesterday and so did not get to revel in all the inaugural festivities in real time. I was able to catch a video stream of the botched swearing in (why, on this very important occasion, did Roberts not have flash cards?!) between classes, but I missed Obama's speech. But, as a true political junkie, I TiVoed the entire day and watched it last evening. And yes, I wept.
The mass of humanity filling the mall was a clear demonstration not only of the historical significance of the event but also of the good will Obama has generated and the country's desire to see the Bush era end. It was indeed a wonderful day.
I don't have much to add to what's been said all over the airwaves and throughout the blogosphere. I think, perhaps, Dianne Feinstein said it best: "the dream that once echoed from the
steps of the Lincoln Memorial has finally reached the steps of the
White House." Barack Hussein Obama is our 44th president. The echoes of slavery remain with us, for sure, but the possibilities of this country have been born anew.
And as he promised during the campaign, Obama got right to work. After attending the traditional national prayer service at the National Cathedral, Obama returned to the Oval Office, making calls to foreign officials, freezing the salaries for top White House staffers who earn $100,000 or more a year, establishing tougher
ethics rules on lobbying--basically limiting what
administration officials can do if they have lobbied before and, if
they leave the administration, blocking them from lobbying during the
time he is in office. Oh, yeah, he also met with his economic and foreign policy teams, ordered federal agencies to freeze any action on
federal regulations Bush pushed through in his waning
days, asked for a suspension of detainee trials at the Guantanamo Bay naval
base so officials could review the cases and the procedures. Hmm. A pretty full day, I'd say.
But, as wonderful as this new beginning is, ugly reminders of political acrimony remain: while Cornyn's procedural blocking of the vote to confirm Clinton was nothing more than political maneuvering (she was confirmed in a 94-2 rollcall vote late this afternoon with Vitter and DeMit as the two hold outs), his move postponing Holder's confirmation is something else all-together. He and other repugs fear Holder and the DOJ will pursue those who ordered torture, i.e., Bush and Cheney who have both admitted to doing so. Cornyn claims he is "seeking more information from Holder on whether the Department of
Justice will pursue criminal prosecutions of 'intelligence personnel'
involved in detainee interrogations," but his real concern is about Bush and Cheney. Remember that Cornyn didn't say a thing when nine U.S. Army soldiers were court-martialed and convicted of crimes committed at Abu Ghraib prison--all were enlisted soldiers and accountability up the chain of command stopped at the rank of staff
sergeant; to date, no commanding officers have been prosecuted.
Besides, the Public Record reported today that DOJ officials are "giving 'serious thought" to Leahy's recommendation to appoint a special counsel to conduct a criminal
probe into the interrogation practices enacted during the Bush
administration.
So the repugs are still doing Bush's dirty work.
About the Roberts' oath flub. I've been reading lots of folks who are
concerned this is some right-wing plan to claim Obama wasn't really
sworn in, but if my reading of the Constitution is accurate, Obama
officially became President at the stroke of noon, oath or no oath. Also, it
was the first time Roberts had administered the oath, so perhaps he was nervous? Or perhaps he wasn't all that keen on swearing in a president who voted against his
confirmation?
Breaking News: soon after posting this, I came across AmericaBlog report that Roberts and Obama had a do-over swearing in this evening--so, all is well.
Recent Comments